Before I go any further in the History of Zero, perhaps I should spend a bit of time elucidating...

Why is zero so special? And why are Brahmagupta's insights so profound anyway?

In order to explain, I will need to state a few definitions. Bear with me, they are a teensy bit abstract, but lots of fun. News flash: by Identity I do NOT mean "who you think you are"...

***

**Identity:**

Assume that we have any set "S" and an operation "%" that relates any two members of S (we'll call them "elements of S") to a third element of S. Then the identity of S under % is an element

*x*in S such that*x*%s = s for__any__s in S.**Note:**It is easy to prove that such an element

*x*is unique for a particular set and operation (I'll show you another time; let's not get sidetracked).

***

Themultiplicative identityfor the real numbers is 1 (because anything times 1 is itself).

Theadditive identityfor the real numbers is 0 (because anything plus 0 is itself).

***

**Inverse:**

Assume that we have any set "S" with identity

*i*, an operation "%" that relates any two members of S (we'll call them "elements of S") to a third element of S and any particular element of S called s. Then the inverse of s in S under % is an element*x*in S such that*x*%s =*i*.**Note:**It is easy to prove that such an element

*x*is unique for a particular set, operation and element. We'll label the inverse of s as s

^{-1}.

***

To descend to a more concrete level once again...(i.e. the real numbers for our purposes)

Theadditive inverseof 2 is -2 (because2+(-2)=0)

Themultiplicative inverseof 2 is 1/2 (because2*1/2=1)

Now I suggest that you go back and re-read Brahmagupta's claims about negative numbers, positive numbers and zero. Hopefully you'll find them a bit more exciting in the light of this (wonderful) information...

## No comments:

## Post a Comment